§

Iron Workers Local 433 (Swinerton Co.)

308 N.L.R.B. 756 (N.L.R.B. 1992)
Iron Workers Local 433 (Swinerton Co.)

11 Cited authorities

  1. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 984 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  2. Little Crow Mill. v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad

    476 U.S. 1158 (1986)   Cited 92 times
    Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79

    404 U.S. 116 (1971)   Cited 103 times
    Upholding NLRB authority to determine merits of jurisdictional dispute notwithstanding an IJDB work assignment, where the competing unions but not the employer had agreed to be bound by the IJDB decision

  4. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., Communications Equipment & Systems Division v. Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    419 U.S. 428 (1975)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that the result of a hearing under § 10(k) of the National Labor Relations Act was not a final disposition with determinate consequences that fell within the definition of "order" under the APA, 5 U.S.C. § 551

  5. Intern. Longshoremen's v. Pacific Maritime

    773 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 30 times
    Finding union's attempt to enforce an arbitration award that was inconsistent with a prior section 10(k) proceeding constituted an unfair labor practice

  6. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    884 F.2d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 21 times
    Finding union cannot assert contract claims in contravention of an existing 10(k) award and thereby frustrate the purpose of section 10(k); "a union cannot force an employer to choose between a Board section 10(k) award and a squarely contrary contract claim"

  7. New Orleans Typographical v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 39 times
    In New Orleans arbitration was permitted to proceed so there would be an expeditious resolution of the dispute in the event the Section 10(k) hearing could not resolve it. Here the Board approved a "voluntary adjustment" because it believed it settled the entire dispute and made a Section 10(k) hearing unnecessary.

  8. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    892 F.2d 130 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 7 times
    In Ga.-Pac., the court affirmed the NLRB's ruling that grievances filed prior to issuance of a § 10(k) award were not coercive; the court also affirmed the NLRB's ruling that grievances filed after the issuance of a § 10(k) award could be coercive.

  9. Bricklayers, Masons Plasterers v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.2d 1316 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that under 5 U.S.C. § 706, "due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Intern Union, United Mine Workers

    727 F.2d 954 (10th Cir. 1984)

    No. 81-2272. February 15, 1984. Diana Ceresi, Washington, D.C. (William Wachter, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. A. Randall Vehar, Washington, D.C. (Willard Owens and Marilyn Townsend, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for respondents. Lynn Paul Mattson of Nichols Wolfe, Inc., Tulsa, Okl., on brief, for intervenor

  11. Section 554 - Adjudications

    5 U.S.C. § 554   Cited 1,050 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to agencies to "issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty."