§

Iron Workers, Local 433

228 N.L.R.B. 1420 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Iron Workers, Local 433

11 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,209 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Humphrey v. Moore

    375 U.S. 335 (1964)   Cited 760 times
    Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  4. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  5. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  6. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  7. U.S. v. Binghamton Construction Co.

    347 U.S. 171 (1954)   Cited 105 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal prevailing wage rate statute's requirement that contractor pay not less specified minima presupposes possibility that successful bidder may have to pay higher rate to workers and that bidder's reliance on government's representation of prevailing rate in computing its bid cannot be said to have been justified

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  9. Kling v. N.L.R.B

    503 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 20 times

    No. 73-2871. January 2, 1975. Albert J. Kline, San Rafael, Cal. (argued) Salle S. Soladay, San Rafael, Cal., for appellant-petitioner. Alan Cirker (argued), of Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent NLRB. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge. Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation. OPINION BURNS, District Judge: In late October 1971, Kaj Kling, a long-time

  10. N.L.R.B. v. International Longshore. Ass'n

    489 F.2d 635 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times

    No. 73-1245. February 19, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 16, 1974. Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford W. Potter, Dir. Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Joseph E. Mayer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Warner F. Brock, Gerald J. Goodwin, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its