Iron Workers Local 111 (Steel Builders)

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
388 U.S. 175 (1967) Cited 334 times
Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Labor Board v. General Motors
373 U.S. 734 (1963) Cited 190 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Lummus Company v. N.L.R.B
339 F.2d 728 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 26 times
In Lummus Co. v. N.L.R.B., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 229, 237-38, 339 F.2d 728, 736-37 (1964), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that "[l]abor relations are practical matters.
N.L.R.B. v. Int. Broth. of Elec. Workers
668 F.2d 991 (8th Cir. 1982) Cited 4 times
No. 81-1491. Submitted November 12, 1981. Decided January 21, 1982. Richard Michael Fischl, William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, David R. Marshall, Atty., William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Benjamin J. Francka, Springfield, Mo., for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 453. Appeal from the National Labor
N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U
320 F.2d 254 (3d Cir. 1963) Cited 17 times 3 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)

Iron Workers Local 111 (Steel Builders)

7 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

Radio Officers v. Labor Board

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Labor Board v. General Motors

Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Lummus Company v. N.L.R.B

In Lummus Co. v. N.L.R.B., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 229, 237-38, 339 F.2d 728, 736-37 (1964), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that "[l]abor relations are practical matters.

N.L.R.B. v. Int. Broth. of Elec. Workers

N.L.R.B. v. Hotel, Motel Club Empl. U

Affirming Board's finding of § 8(b) and § 8(b) violations for improper securing of employee's discharge, with no discussion of how union's conduct constitutes restraint of employee "in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7" under § 8(b)