§

Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE, LLC

09796235 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 4, 2014)
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE, LLC

6 Cited authorities

  1. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.

    90 F.3d 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1996)   Cited 4,321 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim construction that excludes the preferred embodiment is "rarely, if ever, correct and would require highly persuasive evidentiary support"

  2. Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix

    308 F.3d 1193 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 761 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding an alleged prior user's testimony for lack of corroboration when the only contemporaneous corroborating evidence offered was an unissued patent application

  3. Inverness Med. v. Princeton Biomeditech

    309 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that nothing in the patent's claim language, specification, or prosecution history contradicted or altered the plain meaning of the unambiguous claim term "mobility" and thus it was error for the district court to construe the claim term at issue not in accordance with its plain meaning

  4. Schering Corp. v. Amgen Inc.

    222 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that renaming or re-identifying items in the disclosure to comport with later-developed and more precise nomenclature is not new matter

  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 371 times   627 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  6. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 21 times   40 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A