§

IPCO Hospital Supply Corp.

195 N.L.R.B. 995 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
IPCO Hospital Supply Corp.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co.

    359 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    In NLRB v. Laystrom Manufacturing Co., 359 F.2d 799, 800 (7th Cir. 1966), the evidence showed a narrow margin of victory by the union in an election two years earlier and high employee turnover.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Master Touch Dental Laboratories

    405 F.2d 80 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 9 times

    No. 139, Docket 32313. Argued October 29, 1968. Decided December 16, 1968. David C. Nevins, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., Washington, D.C.), for petitioner. Herbert A. Lien, New York City, for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge and KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hudson Motor Car

    128 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 29 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Motor Car Co., 6 Cir., 128 F.2d 528, 533, it was stated: "We think it right and just to say that so far as the record shows, respondent has not wilfully violated the provisions of the Act, but the intent of the employer is not within the ambit of our power of review.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.

    144 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 26 times
    In Glueck, the court recognized that an independent contractor could not be held liable for an unfair labor practice if it was "an entirely innocent and unconscious instrument" of the perpetrator of the practice, but "[w]here an independent contractor knowingly participates in the effectuation of an unfair practice, it places itself within the orbit of the Board's corrective jurisdiction."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brooks

    204 F.2d 899 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13502. May 14, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and William J. Avrutis, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Carter Potruch, Erwin Lerten, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of the Board's order directing