§
Inyo Lumber Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  3. Joanna Cotton Mills v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    176 F.2d 749 (4th Cir. 1949)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that circulation of a petition by an employee for the removal of a foreman against whom the employee held a personal grudge was not protected activity

  4. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co.

    190 F.2d 12 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 19 times

    No. 13402. June 25, 1951. Maurice Alexandre, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Lee Sellers, Otis E. Nelson, Wichita Falls, Tex., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order of the Board are reported at 82 N.L.R.B. 497. The Company contends that the American Federation of Labor (referred

  6. Bussmann Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    111 F.2d 783 (8th Cir. 1940)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 447, 459. May 14, 1940. Petition for Review of Order of National Labor Relations Board Proceedings by the Bussmann Manufacturing Company and McGraw Electric Company and by the Bussmann Employees' Association for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, directing first-named petitioners to cease and desist from discouraging their employees' membership in, and refusing to bargain collectively with, the International Association of Machinists, District No. 9, to bargain collectively

  7. Cathey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    189 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 4 times
    In Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 428, a petition for enforcement of an order of the Labor Board was denied and the complaint dismissed by the Court of Appeals, where the union concerned had failed to comply with the non-Communist affidavit provisions of the Act.