Intracoastal Terminal, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Labor Board v. Crompton Mills
337 U.S. 217 (1949) Cited 102 times
Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
NLRB v. Item Co.
220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955) Cited 36 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Item Company, 220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955), this court held that an employer had no confidentiality privilege to withhold from the union relevant wage data, "which the union's own employee-members apparently refused to disclose to it."
Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 27 times
In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.
Whitfield v. United Steelworkers of America
263 F.2d 546 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 18 times
No. 17290. January 30, 1959. Rehearing Denied February 24, 1959. Roberson L. King, Dent, King, Walker Wickliff, Houston, Tex., for appellants. George Rice, Butler, Binion, Rice Cook, Houston, Tex., for appellees Sheffield Steel Corp. and Armco Steel Corp. Chris Dixie, Dixie Schulman, Houston, Tex., for appellee Local No. 2708 United Steelworkers of America, and Claude Baldree. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. Five negro members of an integrated
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lewis
246 F.2d 886 (9th Cir. 1957) Cited 16 times
In Lewis, a partnership that manufactured and sold shoes gradually transferred the manufacturing portion of its business to a corporation at a different location.
Summit Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
260 F.2d 894 (3d Cir. 1958) Cited 12 times
No. 12573. Argued September 16, 1958. Decided October 28, 1958. Horace E. Smith, York, Pa. (Thomas H. Reed, York, Pa., Charles W. Wolf, Gettysburg, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas Ryan, Washington, D.C., and Falls Church, Va. (Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY
National Labor Rel. Board v. I.B.S. Mfg. Co.
210 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 15 times
No. 14545. February 23, 1954. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott, General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leslie Darden, New Albany, Miss., Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., G. Maynard Smith (of Wilson, Branch Smith), Atlanta, Ga., Fred B. Smith, Ripley, Miss., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 times
No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

Intracoastal Terminal, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

In National Labor Relations Board v. Item Company, 220 F.2d 956 (5th Cir. 1955), this court held that an employer had no confidentiality privilege to withhold from the union relevant wage data, "which the union's own employee-members apparently refused to disclose to it."

In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.

In Lewis, a partnership that manufactured and sold shoes gradually transferred the manufacturing portion of its business to a corporation at a different location.