§

Intl. Molders' and Allied Wkrs., Local 125

178 N.L.R.B. 208 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Intl. Molders' and Allied Wkrs., Local 125

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

  3. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  4. Price v. N.L.R.B

    373 F.2d 443 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times
    Upholding discipline of expulsion for filing decertification petition, in part, because it affected only union membership status, not employee's job or other economic rights

  5. Roberts v. N.L.R.B

    350 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 18942. Argued March 4, 1965. Decided July 21, 1965. Mr. Theodore J. St. Antoine, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. J. Albert Woll and Robert C. Mayer, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before FAHY, DANAHER and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges. FAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amalgamated L. 286

    222 F.2d 95 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 5 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Local 286, 222 F.2d 95 (7th Cir. 1955), the union threatened to deprive certain members of group and hospitalization insurance coverage because they had refused to pay various disciplinary assessments and fines which the Union had imposed upon them.