§

Int'l Ladies Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO

142 N.L.R.B. 82 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Int'l Ladies Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO

11 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  3. Office Employes v. Labor Board

    353 U.S. 313 (1957)   Cited 54 times
    Holding that, when a union acts as an employer, it is deemed an employer within the meaning of the NLRA and subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Guernsey-Muskingum Electric Co-op

    285 F.2d 8 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 58 times
    Finding concerted activity because "a reasonable inference can be drawn that the men involved considered that they had a grievance and decided, among themselves, that they would take it up with management"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Harbison-Fischer Manufacturing Co.

    304 F.2d 738 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 19 times

    No. 19105. June 20, 1962. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, for petitioner. Karl Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges. GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of its order against Harbison-Fischer

  7. National L. Rel. Bd. v. Syracuse Color P

    209 F.2d 596 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 596, we have upheld the Board in finding coercion in the pointed cross-examination of five employees as to union organizing activities within the plant.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.

    264 F.2d 829 (10th Cir. 1959)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5944. March 6, 1959. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1959. Francis Sperandeo, Washington, D.C., (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C., Donald R. Klenk, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. R.J. Woolsey and A. Langley Coffey, Tulsa, Okla. (Farmer, Woolsey, Flippo Bailey, Coffey Coffey, Tulsa, Okla., on the brief), for respondent. Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional enforcement

  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. W.T. Grant Co.

    199 F.2d 711 (9th Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13133. November 10, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Asst., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Coun., Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Irving M. Herman, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eugene M. Foley, New York City, for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges, and HARRISON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is here on petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order issued against respondent, the operator of a

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Buzza-Cardozo

    205 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 8 times

    No. 13486. July 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau and Abraham Siegel, Washington, D.C. (Fredrick Reel, Washington, D.C., argued), for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, Los Angeles, Cal. (Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., argued), for respondent. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations