15 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.
341 U.S. 665 (1951) Cited 126 timesNoting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach
228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 67 timesIn National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".
National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Gen. Drivers, Etc
225 F.2d 205 (5th Cir. 1955) Cited 43 timesNo. 15305. August 2, 1955. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Springs, Md., Owsley Vose, Asso. Ch. Enf. Br., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Cnsl., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Samuel M. Singer, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., Mullinax Wells, Dallas, Tex., Dixie, Ryan Schulman, Houston, Tex., for respondents. Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS and DE VANE, District Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge
Retail Fruit Veg. Clerks U. v. N.L.R.B
249 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1957) Cited 39 timesNo. 15298. November 8, 1957. Carroll, Davis, Burdick, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane Beeson, Norton J. Come, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BONE and FEE, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. Petitioners bring the instant proceeding to this Court for review and seek an order setting aside an order of the National
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Assoc. Musicians
226 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 39 timesNo. 35, Docket 23550. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided November 3, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. David I. Ashe, New York City (Ashe Rifkin, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. CLARK,
Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.
75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948) Cited 51 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C
191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 44 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating § 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."
National Labor Relations Bd. v. L. Un. No. 55
218 F.2d 226 (10th Cir. 1954) Cited 29 timesRecognizing amendments made closed-shop agreements illegal
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"