§

Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 113

142 N.L.R.B. 1418 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 113

9 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional

    372 U.S. 10 (1963)   Cited 284 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  4. Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.

    352 U.S. 282 (1957)   Cited 139 times
    Observing that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"

  5. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating § 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. L. Un. No. 55

    218 F.2d 226 (10th Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times
    Recognizing amendments made closed-shop agreements illegal

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 313, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    254 F.2d 221 (3d Cir. 1958)   Cited 4 times

    No. 12385. Argued March 4, 1958. Decided April 17, 1958. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Ruth V. Reel, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Joseph Donald Craven, Wilmington, Del., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges. GOODRICH, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Labor Board for

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Const. Wkrs

    198 F.2d 391 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 6433. Argued June 24, 1952. Decided July 18, 1952. Writ of Certiorari Denied November 10, 1952. See 73 S.Ct. 170. Thomas McDermott, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hillis Townsend and M.E. Boiarsky, Charleston, W. Va., for respondents. Before