Intl. Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 648

10 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  3. Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co.

    309 U.S. 261 (1940)   Cited 211 times
    In Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U.S. 261, we held that the Board had implied authority to institute contempt proceedings for violation of court decrees enforcing orders of the Board.
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Local 269

    357 F.2d 51 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15268. Argued October 21, 1965. Decided February 4, 1966. Warren Davision, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Thomas L. Parsonnet, Newark, N.J. (Parsonnet Parsonnet, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for Local 269, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick

    198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 27 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.
  6. N.L.R.B. v. L. U. No. 38, United Ass'n

    388 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    No. 21743. January 10, 1968. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, John I. Taylor, Attys., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Joseph R. Grodin, of Neyhart, Grodin Beeson, Robert J. Scolnik, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and BOLDT, District Judge. PER CURIAM: The evidence more than adequately supports

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro., Elec. Wkrs. U. 340

    301 F.2d 824 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    No. 17425. April 10, 1962. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles and Russell Specter, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Neyhart Grodin, by Joseph R. Grodin and Duane B. Beeson, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and ROSS, District Judge. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this court to enforce its order

  8. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. INT'L UNION, ETC

    216 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 9 times

    No. 15064. November 3, 1954. Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with her on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., for respondent. Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and WOODROUGH and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. GARDNER, Chief Judge. This is a petition by

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Kalof Pulp Paper Corporation

    290 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 1 times

    No. 16903. April 3, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Max Bernbaum, Beverly Hills, Cal., and Gordon B. Severance, Monterey Park, Cal., for respondent Company. Warren Woods and Wilson, Woods Villalon, Washington, D.C., for respondent unions. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case is before us

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 803, International Brotherhood of Boilmakers, Iron Ship Builders & Helpers of America

    218 F.2d 299 (3d Cir. 1955)   Cited 5 times

    No. 11281. Argued October 8, 1954. Decided January 12, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jean Engstrom, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis H. Wilderman, Paula R. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. HASTIE