4 Cited authorities
Marine Engineers v. Interlake Co.
370 U.S. 173 (1962) Cited 106 timesIn Interlake, this Court held that only the Board could determine whether the union met the statutory definition of a "labor organization."
Jacuzzi Bros. v. Berkeley Pump Co.
191 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1951) Cited 40 timesNo. 12540. July 23, 1951. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1951. Charles O. Bruce, Nathan G. Gray, Berkeley, Cal. (Edward Brosler, Berkeley, Cal., of counsel), for appellant. Mellin, Hanscom Hursh, Oscar A. Mellin, LeRoy Hanscom and Jack E. Hursh, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge. JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge. Appellants hold two United States patents (Nos. 2,424,285 and 2,344,958) and bring suit for infringement by structures
Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
191 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1951) Cited 27 timesIn Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. NLRB, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 191 F.2d 642, 28 A.L.R.2d 377, cert. denied, 342 U.S. 869, 72 S.Ct. 110, 96 L.Ed. 653 (1951), we held that the word "employees," as used in section 2(5) to define "labor organization," was not itself to be defined in its generic sense. It was to be given only the meaning attributed to it by section 2(3) when the question before the court was whether a given organization was subject to the restrictions of the secondary boycott provision.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington-Oregon
211 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 17 timesNo. 13768. March 8, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau, James A. Ryan, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Wettrick, Flood O'Brien, George E. Flood, George O. Toulouse, Jr., Seattle, Wash., Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the