INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP

9 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  2. Town of Longboat Key v. Reserve, Ltd.

    513 U.S. 1080 (1995)   Cited 15 times

    No. 94-784. January 9, 1995, October TERM, 1994. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 17 F. 3d 1374.

  3. Temp-Masters, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    460 F.3d 684 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 05-2079, 05-2272. Argued June 2, 2006. Decided and Filed July 17, 2006. This decision was originally issued as an "unpublished decision" filed on July 17, 2006. On August 17, 2006, the court designated the opinion as one recommended for full-text publication. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: David W. Miller, Baker Daniels, Fort Wayne, IN, for Petitioner. Jason Walta, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Thomas R. Biehl, Jr., Baker Daniels

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Q-1 Motor Exp., Inc.

    25 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 21 times
    Finding substantial evidence of discrimination based in part on the employer's reliance on "stale" charges
  5. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"
  6. Palace Sports Entm't, Inc. v. NLRB

    411 F.3d 212 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    No. 04-1261, 04-1276. Argued March 18, 2005. Decided May 31, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Robert M. Vercruysse argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Gary S. Fealk. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  7. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  8. Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.3d 534 (6th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 02-1167/1310. Argued: October 21, 2003. Decided and Filed: January 7, 2004. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW AND CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 8-CA-31292. Maurice G. Jenkins (argued and briefed), Paul R. Bernard (abriefed), Jennifer K. Nowaczok (briefed), Dickinson, Wright, PLLC, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner. David Seid (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed)

  9. Hancock, Jr., Inc. v. Hancock

    73 F. App'x 617 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 02-2012, 02-2183. Argued May 8, 2003. Decided September 3, 2003. On Petition for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (11-CA-18716). ARGUED: James Francis Edwards, Jr., Edwards, Ballard, Bishop, Sturm, Clark Keim, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Hancock. David Arthur Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Board. ON BRIEF: Jeffrey A. Lehrer, Edwards, Ballard, Bishop, Sturm, Clark Keim