§

Interstate Truck Parts

312 N.L.R.B. 661 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Interstate Truck Parts

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Comm. Union Assur. Co.

    449 U.S. 871 (1980)   Cited 172 times

    No. 80-73. October 6, 1980. Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 379 So. 2d 757.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Hedstrom Co. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 43 times
    Affirming the Board's finding that a supervisor's statement was coercive, despite employee testimony suggesting otherwise, because the record supported both interpretations

  5. N.L.R.B. v. L.B. Foster Company

    418 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 47 times
    In Foster, the Ninth Circuit answered: "Emphasis is given to the rapid turnover in the employer's personnel as a reason for not enforcing the order.

  6. Elec. Products Div. of Midland-Ross v. N.L.R.B

    617 F.2d 977 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 27 times
    In Electrical Products Division of Midland-Ross Corp. v. NLRB, 617 F.2d 977, 987 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 210, 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980), we referred to three elements as usually found in these cases where we enforced a Gissel II order: effect of the unfair labor practices on a significant portion of the bargaining unit, the participation of senior company officials, and the continuing impact of the same factors that undermined the first election.

  7. Standard-Coosa-Thatcher Carpet v. N.L.R.B

    691 F.2d 1133 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 19 times
    Enforcing the Board’s application of the per se rule

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Garry Mfg. Co.

    630 F.2d 934 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that predictions of strikes are not threats and are permissible if they are based on objective facts and are outside the employer's control

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hale Container Line, Inc.

    943 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times
    Affirming Board finding that an employee's termination was pretextual where the rationale offered by the employer was inconsistent with its recent exemplary evaluation of the employee's performance

  10. Donn Products, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    613 F.2d 162 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 13 times

    No. 77-1269. Argued October 16, 1979. Decided January 17, 1980. Thomas J. McDermott, Joseph S. Ruggie, Jr., Keith A. Ashmus, Daniel W. Hammer, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Paul Speilberg, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Joseph Oertel, Washington, D.C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N.L.R.B., Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent. James F. Gill, Robinson, Silverman, Pearce, Aronsohn, Sand Berman, Michael F. O'Toole, New York City, for intervenor. Petition for review from