§

Interstate Smelting and Refining Co.

148 N.L.R.B. 219 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Interstate Smelting and Refining Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Philamon Laboratories, Inc.

    298 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 32 times

    No. 122, Docket 27028. Argued December 6, 1961. Decided January 17, 1962. William J. Avrutis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City, for respondent. Before MEDINA, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. MARSHALL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  3. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baldwin L. Works

    128 F.2d 39 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 60 times
    Modifying and enforced an order by the Board

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Vapor Blast Manufacturing Company

    287 F.2d 402 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 28 times

    No. 13149. February 28, 1961. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H. William Ihrig, Milwaukee, Wis., Milton Gerwin, Chicago, Ill., Philip L. Padden, Milwaukee, Wis., Earl A. Glick, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, KNOCH, Circuit Judge, and MERCER, District Judge. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. The National

  6. United States v. Montgomery

    126 F.2d 151 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 38 times

    No. 7847. Argued November 6, 1941. Decided January 6, 1942. As Amended March 6, 1942. Rehearing Denied March 7, 1942. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; John Boyd Avis, Judge. Edward Montgomery was convicted of defrauding the United States of tax, possessing an unregistered still and fermenting mash, and removing, etc., untaxed distilled spirits in violation of the internal revenue law, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code §§ 2810, 2833, 2834 and 3321, and he

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. George Groh & Sons

    329 F.2d 265 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times

    No. 7375. March 23, 1964. Glen M. Bendixen, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Council, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. William G. Haynes, of Lillard, Eidson, Lewis Porter, Topeka, Kan., for respondent. Before PICKETT, LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor

  8. N.L.R.B. v. American Aggregate Company

    305 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 9 times

    No. 19109. June 28, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Russell Specter, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Edward Price, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondents. Before BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and DeVANE, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The question before us is whether substantial evidence supports the Board's finding of violations of § 8(a)(1), (3)

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lively Service Company

    290 F.2d 205 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 7 times

    No. 6473. April 21, 1961. Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard L. Pickering, Albuquerque, N.M., for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KERR, District Judge. KERR, District Judge. Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), the National Labor Relations Board petitions this Court for a decree enforcing the order of the Board requiring respondent to cease and desist from certain unfair

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"