§

International Van Lines

177 N.L.R.B. 353 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
International Van Lines

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Jeffery-De Witt Insulator Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    91 F.2d 134 (4th Cir. 1937)   Cited 80 times
    In Jeffery-DeWitt Insulator Co. v. NLRB, 4 Cir., 91 F.2d 134, 139-140, 112 A.L.R. 948 (Parker, J.), there was bargaining followed by a strike resulting in a closing of the plant.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. TRW-Semiconductors, Inc.

    385 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times

    No. 21549. November 24, 1967. Gregory L. Hellrung, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued) for petitioner. Stanley Tobin (argued), Hill, Farrer Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and HAUK, District Judge. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge. Petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The trial examiner found, and the Board adopted his findings, that respondent employer interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees with respect

  5. Dierks Forests, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    385 F.2d 48 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 9 times
    In Dierks Forests, Inc. v. N.L.R.B. (8th Cir. 1967) 385 F.2d 48, 50, the court acknowledged that "We have held on prior occasions that it is an unfair labor practice for a Company to threaten its employees with moving or shutting down the plant, and consequent loss of employment as the result of their support for the Union. [Citations.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

    258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."

  7. Turner v. United States

    258 F.2d 165 (D.C. Cir. 1958)   Cited 15 times
    In Turner v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 258 F.2d 165, 166 (D.C.Cir. 1958) our Court of Appeals laid down the following rule: 'Where there has been a previous appeal or a previous 2255 motion, the District Judge has the discretion to deny relief as to those allegations which could have been, but were not, raised in the earlier proceeding, unless the petitioner has 'some justifiable reason he was previously unable to assert his rights,' or unless he was 'unaware of the significance of relevant facts.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Washington Aluminum Company

    291 F.2d 869 (4th Cir. 1961)   Cited 3 times

    No. 8211. Argued January 11, 1961. Decided June 3, 1961. Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Robert R. Bair, Baltimore, Md. (Venable, Baetjer Howard, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"