§

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 18 AND ITS BRANCHES

363 NLRB No. 184 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 18 AND ITS BRANCHES

12 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,707 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 984 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  3. Carey v. Westinghouse Corp.

    375 U.S. 261 (1964)   Cited 365 times
    Holding that Section 301 gives a federal court jurisdiction over a suit to enforce an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement even if the case is "truly a representation case" that could also be heard by the NLRB under Section 9 of the NLRA

  4. Little Crow Mill. v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad

    476 U.S. 1158 (1986)   Cited 92 times
    Noting that trademark owners must be "afforded some latitude to assess both the impact of another's use of an allegedly infringing trademark as well as the wisdom of pursuing litigation on the issue"

  5. Local 18 Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs v. Ohio Contractors Ass'n

    644 F. App'x 388 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14-4294 02-19-2016 LOCAL 18 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0104n.06 ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO BEFORE: BATCHELDER, MOORE, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 (Local 18), a labor union, filed suit to compel an association

  6. Local 30, United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    1 F.3d 1419 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that maintenance of a suit by the losing union in an NLRB jurisdictional dispute to confirm a corresponding favorable arbitration award amounts to an unfair labor practice

  7. Intern. Longshoremen's v. Pacific Maritime

    773 F.2d 1012 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 30 times
    Finding union's attempt to enforce an arbitration award that was inconsistent with a prior section 10(k) proceeding constituted an unfair labor practice

  8. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    884 F.2d 1407 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 21 times
    Finding union cannot assert contract claims in contravention of an existing 10(k) award and thereby frustrate the purpose of section 10(k); "a union cannot force an employer to choose between a Board section 10(k) award and a squarely contrary contract claim"

  9. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 776 Affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    973 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Affirming the Board's imposition of attorney's fees from the time at which the arbitration became unlawful

  10. New Orleans Typographical v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 39 times
    In New Orleans arbitration was permitted to proceed so there would be an expeditious resolution of the dispute in the event the Section 10(k) hearing could not resolve it. Here the Board approved a "voluntary adjustment" because it believed it settled the entire dispute and made a Section 10(k) hearing unnecessary.