ยง

International Typographical Union

104 N.L.R.B. 806 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
International Typographical Union

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

    339 U.S. 563 (1950)   Cited 132 times
    Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"

  2. Newspaper Pub. Assn. v. Labor Board

    345 U.S. 100 (1953)   Cited 31 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 53. Argued November 19, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. A labor organization does not engage in an unfair labor practice, within the meaning of ยง 8(b)(6) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, when it insists that newspaper publishers pay printers for reproducing advertising matter for which the publishers ordinarily have no use. Pp. 101-111. (a) The language and legislative

  3. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  4. Evans v. International Typographical Union, (S.D.Ind. 1948)

    76 F. Supp. 881 (S.D. Ind. 1948)   Cited 34 times
    In Evans v. Int'l Typographical Union, 76 F.Supp. 881, 888-89 (S.D.Ind. 1948), the district court relied on the "such other duties as the Board may prescribe" language of section 3(d) in concluding the Board may delegate to the General Counsel "functions other than those specifically committed to him by statute."

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gen. Motor Corp.

    179 F.2d 221 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 29 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 179 F.2d 221 it was held that the court need not refuse enforcement because, pendente lite, the original dispute has been settled.

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerville Buick

    194 F.2d 56 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4606. January 28, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Roland E. Ginsburg, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before CLARK, WOODBURY, and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Mine Workers

    202 F.2d 177 (3d Cir. 1953)   Cited 8 times
    Proceeding under the NLRA