§

International Protective Services

339 N.L.R.B. 701 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
International Protective Services

9 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  2. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  5. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Federal Security, Inc.

    154 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting that discretionary jurisdiction may be waived

  7. East Chicago Rehabilitation Center v. N.L.R.B

    710 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Trevino v. Celanese Corp., 710 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1983), the Fifth Circuit held that in determining whether a corporation related to an employer may be liable under Title VII as a joint employer four factors are to be considered: (1) interrelation of operations; (2) centralized control of labor relations; (3) common management; and (4) common ownership or financial control.

  8. Montefiore Hospital Medical Ctr. v. N.L.R.B

    621 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 560, 790, Dockets 79-4156, 79-4184. Argued January 14, 1980. Decided April 28, 1980. Jerold D. Jacobson, New York City (David H. Diamond, Fred Kolikoff, Guggenheimer Untermyer, New York City, of counsel), for employer-petitioner. Robert Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Norton J. Come, Acting Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Assn. Gen. Counsel, James Y. Callear, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Marshall Car Wheel

    218 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 40 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Marshall Car Wheel Foundry Co., 218 F.2d 409, 411 (5th Cir. 1955) cited by respondents, the planned employee walkout held to be unprotected occurred at the moment molten iron was ready to be poured and this action "might well have resulted in substantial property damage" to the plant.