§

International Powder Metallurgy Co. Inc.

134 N.L.R.B. 1605 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
International Powder Metallurgy Co. Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. Telegraphers v. Chicago N.W. R. Co.

    362 U.S. 330 (1960)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia

  3. J.I. Case Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

    253 F.2d 149 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 20 times
    In J.I. Case we simply noted that a union has, absent a showing of relevance, no "`per se' right to information" it requests from an employer during the course of collective bargaining.

  4. International Woodworkers of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    263 F.2d 483 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 14303, 14354. Argued December 8, 1958. Decided January 29, 1959. Mr. David E. Feller, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Arthur J. Goldberg and Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 14303. Miss Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hopwood R. Co.

    98 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 32 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 98 F.2d 97, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit based its conclusion that a company engaged in repairing milk and ice cream containers was engaged in "interstate commerce" within the meaning of the Act upon the fact that 23% of the containers on which work was to be done were transported in the company's truck from and to states other than the state where the work was performed.