International Paper Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Midland Transp. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    962 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir. 1992)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 91-2995, 91-3335. Submitted February 12, 1992. Decided May 4, 1992. John F. Veldey, Marshalltown, Iowa, argued (John B. Grier, on brief), for petitioner Midland Transp. Co., Inc. Karen L. Arndt, Washington, D.C., argued (Paul J. Spielberg, Jerry M. Hunter, D. Randall Frye and Aileen A. Armstrong, on brief), for respondent N.L.R.B. Review of order of National Labor Relations Board. Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and WOODS, District Judge. The HONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District