International Organization of Masters

5 Cited authorities

  1. William E. Arnold Co. v. Carpenters

    417 U.S. 12 (1974)   Cited 111 times
    Holding that "[w]hen an activity is either arguably protected by 7 or arguably prohibited by 8 of the NLRA," federal courts must defer to the NLRB, but that when "the activity in question also constitutes a breach of a [CBA], the [NLRB's] authority is not exclusive and does not destroy the jurisdiction of the courts in suits under [LMRA ยง] 301"
  2. Berkley v. U. S

    416 U.S. 970 (1974)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that "officers are not required to announce at every place of entry" and approving an entry where officers made one announcement at the front door while seconds later other officers entered another
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Nat. Maritime U. of Am., Afl-Cio

    486 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 24 times
    In NLRB v. National Maritime Union, 486 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 970, 94 S.Ct. 1993, 40 L.Ed.2d 559 (1974), the Second Circuit found unlawful under section 8(e) of the NLRA a provision in a collective bargaining agreement that required a vessel-owner employer to obtain from any purchaser of a vessel a commitment to comply with the union contract.
  4. United Optical Wkrs. U. v. Sterling Optical Co.

    500 F.2d 220 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    No. 983, Docket 74-1047. Argued May 13, 1974. Decided July 11, 1974. John E. Jay, New York City (Parker, Chapin Flattau, New York City, on the brief, B. Michael Thrope, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant. Robert M. Ziskin, New York City (Sipser, Weinstock, Harper Dorn, New York City, on the brief, I. Philip Sipser, Belle Harper, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and

  5. International Org., Masters, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    351 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 15537. Argued November 3, 1960. Decided June 21, 1965. Miss Betty H. Olchin, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, Cristobal, Canal Zone, with whom Messrs. Mozart G. Ratner and Isaac N. Groner, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioners. Miss Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., at the time the brief was filed, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost