§

International Medication Systems, LTD

244 N.L.R.B. 861 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
International Medication Systems, LTD

5 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. American Art Industries, Inc.

    415 F.2d 1223 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Upholding the Bannon Mills principle and recognizing that "to maintain the integrity of the hearing process" the ALJ properly refused to admit secondary evidence proffered by the employer which it refused to produce in the face of a valid subpoena duces tecum

  4. N.L.R.B. v. C.H. Sprague Son Co.

    428 F.2d 938 (1st Cir. 1970)   Cited 14 times

    No. 7465. June 30, 1970. Eugene B. Granof, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and James P. Hendricks, Washington, D.C., Attorney, were on the brief, for petitioner. Bernard B. Gould, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Robert M. Baptiste, Washington, D.C., with whom Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D.C. was on brief, for intervenor Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No.

  5. Paudler v. Paudler

    185 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 18 times
    In Paudler, the Fifth Circuit recognized an individual's right to change domicile for any reason at any time. The jurisdictional inquiry is limited to the fact of relocation and the intended and presumed permanency of that relocation; it does not include consideration of the motivation for making that change.