Vaca v. Sipes

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers

Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."

N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Teamsters “General” Local Union No. 200

Discussing a union's responsibilities under the duty of fair representation

Conley v. N.L.R.B

Finding anti-union animus when employer terminated an employee for previously tolerated conduct

United States v. Carneglia

Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

Holding summary judgment should be denied "where the movant's papers are insufficient on their face or themselves demonstrate the existence of a material issue of fact"

Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks

Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

Rule 804 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-When the Declarant Is Unavailable as a Witness

Recognizing an exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule when the party against whom the statement is offered has engaged in wrongdoing which procures the unavailability of the declarant

Rule 807 - Residual Exception

Requiring "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" under the residual exception to the hearsay rule