§

International Longshoremen'S And Warehousemen'S Local 13; International Longshoremen'S And Warehousemen'S Local 63

295 N.L.R.B. 704 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
International Longshoremen'S And Warehousemen'S Local 13; International Longshoremen'S And Warehousemen'S Local 63

4 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Intern. Org. of Masters, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    575 F.2d 896 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 14 times

    No. 76-1633. Argued September 29, 1977. Decided March 6, 1978. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Burton M. Epstein, New York City, and Robert E. Nagle, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Aileen Armstrong, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Roger H. Briton, New York City, of the bar of the

  4. Bricklayers Stone Masons Union v. N.L.R.B

    562 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 8 times
    In Bricklayers, the Board found that the picket line clauses of the bricklayers', laborers', engineers', and plumbers' unions were in violation of section 8(e) of the Act because the clauses were broad enough as written or applied to sanction refusals to cross secondary picket lines, and the clauses were not saved by virtue of the construction industry proviso to section 8(e).