International Longshore and Warehouse Union (Pacific Maritime Assoc.)

15 Cited authorities

Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.
530 U.S. 133 (2000) Cited 21,532 times 22 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "trier of fact can reasonably infer from the falsity of the explanation that the employer is dissembling to cover up a discriminatory purpose"
Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,209 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Barrentine v. Ark.-Best Freight Sys.
450 U.S. 728 (1981) Cited 1,697 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that Fair Labor Standards Act claims may be brought in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,076 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans
431 U.S. 553 (1977) Cited 1,339 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an allegedly discriminatory practice that was no longer actionable could not form the predicate of a challenge to a neutral seniority system
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell
451 U.S. 56 (1981) Cited 757 times
Holding that a plaintiff first must establish that the union breached its duty of fair representation before a court may consider evidence of an employer's alleged violation of a CBA
Machinists Local v. Labor Board
362 U.S. 411 (1960) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
Early v. Eastern Transfer
699 F.2d 552 (1st Cir. 1983) Cited 74 times
Holding that courts "will not entertain a claim of personal bias where it could have been but was not raised at the hearing to which it applies"
Teamsters Local U. No. 30 v. Helms Exp. Inc.
591 F.2d 211 (3d Cir. 1979) Cited 44 times
In Teamsters Local Union No. 30 v. Helms Express, Inc., 591 F.2d 211 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 837 (1979), we held that an award by a trucking industry joint union employer committee was entitled to identical deference as an award granted by a third party arbitrator.
Lucas v. N.L.R.B
333 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 13 times
Defining substantial evidence
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 336,252 times 161 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

International Longshore and Warehouse Union (Pacific Maritime Assoc.)

15 Cited authorities

Holding that a "trier of fact can reasonably infer from the falsity of the explanation that the employer is dissembling to cover up a discriminatory purpose"

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that Fair Labor Standards Act claims may be brought in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that an allegedly discriminatory practice that was no longer actionable could not form the predicate of a challenge to a neutral seniority system

Holding that a plaintiff first must establish that the union breached its duty of fair representation before a court may consider evidence of an employer's alleged violation of a CBA

Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

Holding that courts "will not entertain a claim of personal bias where it could have been but was not raised at the hearing to which it applies"

In Teamsters Local Union No. 30 v. Helms Express, Inc., 591 F.2d 211 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 837 (1979), we held that an award by a trucking industry joint union employer committee was entitled to identical deference as an award granted by a third party arbitrator.

Defining substantial evidence

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit