International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union

15 Cited authorities

  1. Hughes v. Superior Court

    339 U.S. 460 (1950)   Cited 285 times
    In Hughes v. Superior Court, 339 U.S. 460, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not bar use of the injunction to prohibit picketing of a place of business solely to secure compliance with a demand that its employees be hired in percentage to the racial origin of its customers.
  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates ยง 8 of the NLRA
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.

    354 U.S. 284 (1957)   Cited 163 times
    In Teamsters Union, supra, a railroad was held to be barred from seeking relief in the state courts against a secondary boycott.
  4. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Wohl

    315 U.S. 769 (1942)   Cited 236 times
    Reversing an injunction against peaceful picketing
  5. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that ยง 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred
  7. Cabell v. Markham

    148 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1945)   Cited 391 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Warning "not to make a fortress out of the dictionary"
  8. United States v. Giles

    300 U.S. 41 (1937)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that a criminal statute applies to a defendant who directs that a criminal act be performed through an intermediary and stating that the accused need not personally perform the criminal act to be held liable
  9. Rosenberg Brothers Co., Inc. v. Arnold

    283 F.2d 406 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 82 times

    No. 16762. October 10, 1960. Johnson Stanton, Marshall A. Staunton, Gardiner Johnson, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. Severson, Zang, Werson, Berke Larson, Nathan R. Berke, David C. Bull, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and BOWEN, District Judge. PER CURIAM. In view of the extreme liberality generally in favoring amendments to pleadings under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the general policy thereunder of wrapping in one bundle all matters

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Federbush Co.

    121 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1941)   Cited 85 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Federbush Co., 121 Fed. 2d 954, decided July 18, 1941, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was written by Judge Learned Hand.