§

International Harvester Co.

87 N.L.R.B. 1123 (N.L.R.B. 1949)
International Harvester Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    113 F.2d 85 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 36 times
    In Humble Oil Refining Company v. N.L.R.B., 5 Cir., 113 F.2d 85, 88, and other cases, we have pointed out; that the statute does not make the Board either "guardian or ruler" over employees of employer; it does not authorize it to substitute its judgment for that of the employer as to what is sufficient cause for discharge. It empowers it only to deliver the employees from acts and restraints forbidden by the statute, and to reinstate them when they have been discriminatorily discharged.

  2. Rapid Roller Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    126 F.2d 452 (7th Cir. 1942)   Cited 31 times
    In Rapid Roller Co. v. NLRB, 126 F.2d 452, 457-60 (7th Cir. 1942), the court determined that transferring employees from department to department constituted a condition of employment that required collective bargaining.

  3. Western Cartridge Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    134 F.2d 240 (7th Cir. 1943)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 8142, 8155. March 1, 1943. Petitions to review and set aside, and on request for enforcement of, an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Separate petitions by Western Cartridge Company and by Western Cartridge Employees' Independent Union, etc., to review and set aside, and request by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of, an order of such board requiring the Western Cartridge Company to cease and desist from giving effect to individual employment contracts, from

  4. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Engelhorn Sons

    134 F.2d 553 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 17 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. John Engelhorn Sons, 134 F.2d 553, 556, the Third Circuit ordered an employer to deal with a union that the Board had certified, although it did not have a majority vote, because a rival union, which did have a majority, was shown to have used improper persuasion to get the votes of "six or seven" out of eighty employees in the plant.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brezner Tanning Co.

    141 F.2d 62 (1st Cir. 1944)   Cited 9 times

    No. 3948. February 17, 1944. Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against the Brezner Tanning Company, Inc., under the National Labor Relations Act § 1 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. Decree entered enforcing the order in accordance with opinion. LeRoy Marceau, Litigation Atty., of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Roman Beck