§

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 771 and Joint Council 53 (Pennsy Supply, Inc. d/b/a Rea

357 N.L.R.B. 2203 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 771 and Joint Council 53 (Pennsy Supply, Inc. d/b/a Rea

3 Cited authorities

  1. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  2. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

    856 F.2d 579 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 90 times
    Holding in context of a CBA that "[t]he parties' objective intent to create a contract is relevant — not their subjective beliefs"

  3. B. Brooks, v. Int'l Ladies' Garment Wkrs. U

    835 F.2d 1164 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 35 times
    Stating that district court's finding that a contract exists is subject to de novo review