International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 492 (Fire & Ice Productions, Inc.)

12 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,674 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,076 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers
493 U.S. 67 (1989) Cited 301 times
Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 881 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.
412 U.S. 67 (1973) Cited 49 times
Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
STAGEHANDS REFER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELA
315 F. App'x 318 (2d Cir. 2009) 1 Legal Analyses
Nos. 07-2126-ag (L), 07-3103-ag (xap). March 12, 2009. Petition of Petitioners-Cross-Respondents for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated August 31, 2006. Petition of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") for the enforcement of that Order. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED and the cross-petition for enforcement is GRANTED. Leon M. Rosenblatt, Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt, West
Boilermakers Local No. 374 v. N.L.R.B
852 F.2d 1353 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Cited 13 times
In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec Wkrs., Local 11
772 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 9 times
No. 84-7439. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1985. Decided September 24, 1985. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard, Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner N.L.R.B. Robert Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-intervenors Loveall, Sokol and Mott. Elizabeth R. Lishner, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN
Int'l Union of Operating Engr. v. N.L.R.B
496 F.2d 1308 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 6 times
No. 73-1760. Argued January 29, 1974. Decided May 31, 1974. Louis S. Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner; Alan S. Belkin, Belkin Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief. Stuart Rosenblum, N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David Miller, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l U. of Operating Engineers
555 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1977) Cited 3 times
In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 492 (Fire & Ice Productions, Inc.)

12 Cited authorities

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line

In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.

In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.