§

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

87 N.L.R.B. 502 (N.L.R.B. 1949)
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

4 Cited authorities

  1. United Bhd. of Carpenters, Etc. v. Sperry

    170 F.2d 863 (10th Cir. 1948)   Cited 55 times
    In Carpenters District Council v. Sperry ex rel. NLRB, 170 F.2d 863, 868-69 (1948), the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, addressed the claim of the defendant union that its peaceful picketing and blacklisting of a construction company was protected by the First Amendment.

  2. Printing Specialties & Paper Converters Union v. Le Baron

    171 F.2d 331 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 36 times

    No. 11894. December 13, 1948. Rehearing Denied January 19, 1949. Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge. Proceeding by Howard F. Le Baron, Regional Director of the Twenty-First Region of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, against Printing Specialties and Paper Converters Union, Local 388, A.F.L., and another, to enjoin alleged unfair labor practices in violation

  3. U.S. Fidelity G. Co. v. Commercial Nat. Bank

    55 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1932)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6262. January 20, 1932. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Duval West, Judge. Suit by the Commercial National Bank of Brady, Texas, against the United States Fidelity Guaranty Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded. R.L. Ball and A.W. Seeligson, both of San Antonio, Tex., for appellant. W.J. Rogers, of San Antonio, Tex., for appellee. Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON

  4. Halsey v. Sinsebaugh

    15 N.Y. 485 (N.Y. 1857)   Cited 20 times
    In Halsey v. Sinsebaugh (1857), 15 N.Y. 485, the court, quoting from Cowen and Hill's notes to Phillips' Evidence, approved the statement that, "An original memorandum, made by the witness presently after the facts noted in it transpired, and proved by the same witness at the trial, may be read by him, and is evidence to the jury of the facts contained in the memorandum, although the witness may have totally forgotten such facts at the time of the trial."