International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

9 Cited authorities

Railroad Comm'n v. Pullman Co.
312 U.S. 496 (1941) Cited 2,941 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that federal courts should ordinarily abstain where the resolution of a federal constitutional issue may be rendered irrelevant by the determination of a predicate state-law question
McNeese v. Board of Education
373 U.S. 668 (1963) Cited 754 times
Holding that where plaintiffs assert the "depriv[ation] ... of rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment ... [s]uch claims are entitled to be adjudicated in the federal courts"
Leedom v. Kyne
358 U.S. 184 (1958) Cited 727 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers
Myers v. Bethlehem Corp.
303 U.S. 41 (1938) Cited 1,426 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court
McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional
372 U.S. 10 (1963) Cited 284 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America
391 U.S. 418 (1968) Cited 215 times
Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
Greene v. United States
376 U.S. 149 (1964) Cited 237 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding regulations affecting antecedent rights are not to be given retroactive effect absent an "unequivocal" manifestation the regulations were meant to be applied retroactively
California Comm'n v. United States
355 U.S. 534 (1958) Cited 262 times
Ruling that state regulations could not require common carriers to obtain state approval before offering reduced rates to the United States
Section 411 - Bill of rights; constitution and bylaws of labor organizations
29 U.S.C. § 411 Cited 1,747 times
Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

9 Cited authorities

Holding that federal courts should ordinarily abstain where the resolution of a federal constitutional issue may be rendered irrelevant by the determination of a predicate state-law question

Holding that where plaintiffs assert the "depriv[ation] ... of rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment ... [s]uch claims are entitled to be adjudicated in the federal courts"

Holding that federal courts have jurisdiction to strike down agency orders made in excess of the agency's delegated powers

Holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies mandated before seeking injunctive relief in court

Holding that "the law of the flag state ordinarily governs the internal affairs of a ship"

Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution

Holding regulations affecting antecedent rights are not to be given retroactive effect absent an "unequivocal" manifestation the regulations were meant to be applied retroactively

Ruling that state regulations could not require common carriers to obtain state approval before offering reduced rates to the United States

Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action