§

International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Ware-Housemen And Helpers Of America, Afl--Cio

299 N.L.R.B. 30 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Ware-Housemen And Helpers Of America, Afl--Cio

3 Cited authorities

  1. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Newtown Corp.

    819 F.2d 677 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 5 times

    No. 86-5911. Argued May 4, 1987. Decided June 3, 1987. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marc B. Seidman (argued), Linda Dreeben, Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert Houlihan (argued), Stoll, Keenon and Park, Lexington, Ky., for respondent. Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and ENGEL and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant

  3. N.L.R.B. v. M M Oldsmobile, Inc.

    377 F.2d 712 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that in context of National Labor Relations Act breach of contract is "not" ipso facto, an unfair labor practice