§

International Brotherhood of Teamster, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

101 N.L.R.B. 1284 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
International Brotherhood of Teamster, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  3. Carpenters Union v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 707 (1951)   Cited 89 times
    In Carpenters Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 71 S.Ct. 966, 971, supra, the Supreme Court said: "The use of such pressure on this renovation project was merely a sample of what might be repeated elsewhere if not prohibited. The underlying dispute between petitioners and Watson's has not been shown to have been resolved."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating § 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."

  5. Douds v. Sheet Metal Workers Internat'l Ass'n

    101 F. Supp. 273 (E.D.N.Y. 1951)   Cited 8 times

    Civ. No. 12093. November 20, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel Ross, and Sanfjord B. Teu, II, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Boudin, Cohn Glickstein, New York City, Samuel Harris Cohen, Daniel W. Meyer, New York City, of counsel, for respondent. GALSTON, District Judge. Upon the petition filed pursuant to Section 10( l) of the National Labor Relations

  6. Douds v. Sheet Metal Workers International Asso

    101 F. Supp. 970 (E.D.N.Y. 1952)

    Civ. No. 12093 January 16, 1952 George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Winthrop A. Johns, Asst. General Counsel, and Samuel Ross, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Boudin, Cohn & Glickstein, New York City, Samuel Harris Cohen, New York City, of counsel, for respondent. This is a motion for reconsideration of my opinion rendered November 20, 1951, D.C., 101 F.Supp. 273, in which statutory injunctive relief was

  7. Piedmont Shirt Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    138 F.2d 738 (4th Cir. 1943)   Cited 3 times

    No. 5145. November 9, 1943. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by Piedmont Shirt Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which asked enforcement of order. Order enforced. Before PARKER, SOPER, and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges. Alfred F. Burgess, of Greenville, S. Car. (C. Granville Wyche and Thomas A. Wofford, both of Greenville, S. Car., on the brief), for petitioner. LeRoy Marceau, Atty., National Labor Relations