§

International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, 302

272 N.L.R.B. 920 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, 302

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  3. Helgesen v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local Union 498

    548 F.2d 175 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 15 times
    Concluding that the union did not act with a proscribed secondary intent when it picketed an alternative public location reasonably separated from the neutral gate instead of picketing the primary gate

  4. Constar, Inc. v. Plumbers Local 447

    568 F. Supp. 1440 (E.D. Cal. 1983)   Cited 8 times

    No. CIV. S-81-807 LKK. August 2, 1983. Thierman, Simpson Cook, Paul V. Simpson, Roger M. Mason, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Victor A. Bertolani, Inc., Sacramento, Cal., for Plumbers Local 447. OPINION KARLTON, Chief Judge. The developer of an office building and the general contractor on the project brought this suit against a local of the plumbers' union. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant's activities at the construction site constituted an illegal secondary boycott which damaged

  5. Brewery Wkrs. L. Un. No. 67 v. N.L.R.B

    220 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 12115, 12207. Argued December 3, 1954. Decided March 10, 1955. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn, William J. Walsh and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No. 12,115. Mr. Earle K. Shawe and Mr. William J. Rosenthal, a member of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Allan Kamerow, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for Washington