International Brotherhood Of Boilmakers

11 Cited authorities

  1. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale

    463 U.S. 491 (1983)   Cited 277 times
    Holding that the NLRA does not preempt state law contract actions by replacement workers to enforce terms of an employment contract
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  3. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
  5. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
  6. Philip Carey Mfg., v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 15289, 15330. March 31, 1964. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief; E.J. Fasold, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C., for International Union, etc. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for N.L.R.B. Before

  7. Rogers Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    486 F.2d 644 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 20 times
    Leaving until compliance proceedings the question of which lone striker out of fourteen would not be entitled to reinstatement when the NLRB only had the authority to reinstate thirteen strikers
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Harrison Ready Mix Concrete, Inc.

    770 F.2d 78 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    No. 84-6063. Argued July 11, 1985. Decided August 13, 1985. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Suzanne Stocking, Frances O'Connell (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J. Michael Fischer (argued), Ennis, Roberts and Fischer Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Before MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. This is an enforcement action by the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB,

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Transport Company of Texas

    438 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 10 times

    No. 30191 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. February 10, 1971. Rehearing Denied March 22, 1971. Clifford Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Eugene B. Granof, Joseph C. Thackery, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Powell, Brown Maverick, William A. Brown

  10. Swarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    303 F.2d 668 (6th Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14753. May 23, 1962. Joseph L. Halberstein, Marion, Ohio (Strelitz, Halberstein Mitchell, Marion, Ohio, Hubert T. Campbell, Frost Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and STARR, Senior District