International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Coca-Cola Bot. Co.
350 U.S. 264 (1956) Cited 50 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Louisville, 1956, 350 U.S. 264, 76 S.Ct. 383, 384, 100 L.Ed. 285, the Supreme Court rejected the attempted distinction as "too thin a dialectic enterprise".
Shoreline Enterprises of Am., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
262 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1959) Cited 46 timesIn Shoreline Enterprises of America, Inc. v. NLRB, 262 F.2d 933 (5 Cir. 1959), the court recognized that a Board agent is present not only to make sure eligible voters vote but also to make sure that an employee who thinks he is eligible may cast a challenged ballot.
Goodman Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
234 F.2d 775 (7th Cir. 1956) Cited 5 timesNo. 11403. June 15, 1956. Edward S. Stern, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. David B. Rothstein, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (respondent), entered January 28, 1955, against Goodman Manufacturing Company of Chicago