§

International Broadcasting Corp.

99 N.L.R.B. 130 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
International Broadcasting Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 232 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clarksburg Pub. Co.

    120 F.2d 976 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 18 times

    No. 4772. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Clarksburg Publishing Company for enforcement of a cease and desist order. Order modified and affirmed. David Findling, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard C. Barrett, and Ralph Winkler, all of

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Biles Coleman L. Co.

    98 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 19 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Biles Coleman Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 18, 20, it was said: "So far as concerns the enforcement of the Board's order this is a nisi prius tribunal, and the resistive respondent by its answer, rather than by brief, should raise the issue as to any allegation of the petition which is contested."

  7. People v. Duffy

    79 Cal.App.2d 875 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)   Cited 7 times

    Docket No. 2231. April 18, 1947. APPEAL from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles and from an order sustaining a demurrer to a count of a complaint. Kenneth A. White, Judge. Affirmed. Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Donald M. Redwine, Assistant City Attorney, and John L. Bland, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant. Pestana Esterman, Katz, Gallagher Margolis and John W. Porter for Respondents. BISHOP, J. We are called upon, in this appeal, to determine upon which side of a fairly

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Everett Van Kleeck

    189 F.2d 516 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 202, Docket 21903. Argued May 8, 1951. Decided May 31, 1951. George P. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Harvey B. Diamond and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Adolph Bangser, New York City, for respondent. Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The decision and order under review affirms the Trial Examiner's conclusion