§

International Botherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

130 N.L.R.B. 1020 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
International Botherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Stark v. Starr

    94 U.S. 477 (1876)   Cited 112 times
    Holding that client can be bound by actions of attorney upon ratification of those acts

  2. Federal Tel. R. Corp. v. Assoc. Tel. T

    169 F.2d 1012 (3d Cir. 1948)   Cited 24 times
    In Federal Telephone Radio Corp. v. Associated Telephone Telegraph Co., 169 F.2d 1012 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 859, 69 S.Ct. 133, 93 L.Ed. 406 (1948), the Third Circuit found a sufficient threat of infringement litigation in an advertisement by the defendant stating that "we must... take every possible step to protect our own patent position" and that "no use will hereafter be made of any of our patents" except by licensed persons.

  3. Brewery Wkrs. L. Un. No. 67 v. N.L.R.B

    220 F.2d 380 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 12115, 12207. Argued December 3, 1954. Decided March 10, 1955. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn, William J. Walsh and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No. 12,115. Mr. Earle K. Shawe and Mr. William J. Rosenthal, a member of the bar of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Allan Kamerow, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for Washington

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Prettyman

    117 F.2d 786 (6th Cir. 1941)   Cited 26 times

    No. 8547. February 13, 1941. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of a cease and desist order issued by the board against Horace G. Prettyman and another, copartners doing business as the Ann Arbor Press. Petition denied without prejudice to the right of the board to conduct a new hearing. Richard C. Barrett, of Washington, D.C. (Charles Fahy, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, and Robert

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Thompson Products

    130 F.2d 363 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 20 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, 6 Cir., 130 F.2d 363, 368, this court pointed out that "the test, whether a challenged organization is employer controlled, is not an objective one but rather subjective, from the standpoint of employees."

  6. Lane v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    186 F.2d 671 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 3928, 4075. January 2, 1951. Rehearing Denied March 19, 1951. Morris P. Glushien, New York City (Mullinax, Wells Ball, Dallas, Tex., with him on the brief), for petitioner, Mavis Lane. Nathaniel H. Janes, New York City, for respondent, Seamprufe, Inc. Louis Libbin, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Irving M. Herman, all of Washington, D.C.), for National Labor Relations Board. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN

  7. Hartford Accident v. Weeks Drug Store

    161 S.W.2d 153 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942)   Cited 12 times

    No. 9093. March 25, 1942. Rehearing Denied April 15, 1942. Appeal from District Court, Tom Green County; John F. Sutton, Judge. Action by Wade Mahan, a minor, by his sister as next friend, against Weeks Drug Store to recover for injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of an employee of the Weeks Drug Store, and against the Hartford Accident Indemnity Company, wherein the Hartford Accident Indemnity Company filed a cross-action, which was in effect a plea in intervention, setting up its claim

  8. Tuttle v. Everhot Heater Co.

    249 N.W. 467 (Mich. 1933)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 36,844. Submitted January 12, 1933. Decided June 29, 1933. Rehearing denied August 29, 1933. Appeal from Wayne; Warner (Glenn E.), J., presiding. Submitted January 12, 1933. (Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 36,844.) Decided June 29, 1933. Rehearing denied August 29, 1933. Separate actions of case by Harris B. Tuttle and Olive Tuttle and a third action of case by plaintiffs jointly against Everhot Heater Company, a Michigan corporation, and another for damages alleged to

  9. Lincoln v. Superior Court

    51 Cal.App.2d 61 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)   Cited 5 times

    Docket No. 6758. April 1, 1942. PROCEEDING in prohibition against the Superior Court of Madera County continuing in force a restraining order. Writ denied. Walter Gould Lincoln, in pro. per., for Petitioners. Newby Newby, David E. Peckinpah, Neice Crane and David P. Barcroft for Respondents. CURLER, J. pro tem. This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the Superior Court of the County of Madera, from continuing in force a restraining order which prohibited the Petitioners, Walter

  10. Rosenstein v. Hynson

    147 A. 529 (Md. 1929)   Cited 10 times
    In Rosenstein v. Hynson, 157 Md. 626, supra, the vendor filed an action of replevin to recover a player piano sold on a conditional contract of sale calling for installment payments.