§

International Association Of Firefighters, Afl--Cio

297 N.L.R.B. 865 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
International Association Of Firefighters, Afl--Cio

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Northern California v. Award Service

    474 U.S. 1081 (1986)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that, despite the specific provisions of section 502, "an employer may bring an action under ERISA to enforce its terms where the employer alleges specific and personal injury"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    686 F.2d 63 (1st Cir. 1982)

    No. 81-1854. Argued June 4, 1982. Decided August 13, 1982. Penny Pilzer, Attorney, with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. Martin Ames, Chelmsford, Mass., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CAMPBELL and BREYER, Circuit Judges, and PETTINE

  6. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,588 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party