International Association Of Bridge, Structural And Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 373

24 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.
396 U.S. 258 (1969) Cited 184 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 326 times
Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"
Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 7 (1940) Cited 231 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local 480
466 U.S. 720 (1984) Cited 21 times
Reversing court of appeals' modification of backpay specification to include only charging employees where Board had delayed amending specification
N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation
354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 96 times
In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.
N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.
311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 71 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
Carpenter Sprinkler Corp. v. N.L.R.B
605 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1979) Cited 31 times
Concluding that since "the Board is not required to observe automatically all the rules of evidence governing the trial of cases in court," it was entitled to create a new evidentiary rule
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 433
600 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1979) Cited 31 times
Holding that "[t]he Board may properly find an unfair labor practice when the issue has been fully litigated even though not specifically pleaded in the complaint"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 925
460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972) Cited 37 times
No. 71-2158. May 17, 1972. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Stanley R. Zirkin, Nancy M. Sherman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: The

International Association Of Bridge, Structural And Ornamental Iron Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 373

24 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

Reversing court of appeals' modification of backpay specification to include only charging employees where Board had delayed amending specification

In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

Concluding that since "the Board is not required to observe automatically all the rules of evidence governing the trial of cases in court," it was entitled to create a new evidentiary rule

Holding that "[t]he Board may properly find an unfair labor practice when the issue has been fully litigated even though not specifically pleaded in the complaint"