International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied

13 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,215 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,079 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
  3. Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild

    525 U.S. 33 (1998)   Cited 421 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discretionary actions taken by the union on a member's behalf are not arbitrary even where the member can demonstrate they were "erroneous or unsuccessful."
  4. Motor Coach Employees v. Lockridge

    403 U.S. 274 (1971)   Cited 828 times
    Holding wrongful discharge action brought in state court precluded by pervasiveness of federal regulation in the area
  5. Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers

    493 U.S. 67 (1989)   Cited 302 times
    Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
  6. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

    444 U.S. 672 (1980)   Cited 183 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control
  8. Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

    522 U.S. 948 (1997)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula
  9. Mock v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co.

    971 F.2d 522 (10th Cir. 1992)   Cited 273 times
    Holding that an employer conducting an internal investigation suspecting theft by the employee will inevitably require an analysis of what the CBA permitted
  10. Beasley v. Food Fair of North Carolina

    416 U.S. 653 (1974)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that state law cannot afford supervisors a cause of action that they would not have under the NLRA as section 14 relieves "the employer of obligations under any law, either national or local, relating to collective bargaining"
  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,218 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”