International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving picture Technicians, Artists and Allied

10 Cited authorities

Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,076 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers
493 U.S. 67 (1989) Cited 301 times
Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 881 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
STAGEHANDS REFER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELA
315 F. App'x 318 (2d Cir. 2009) 1 Legal Analyses
Nos. 07-2126-ag (L), 07-3103-ag (xap). March 12, 2009. Petition of Petitioners-Cross-Respondents for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board, dated August 31, 2006. Petition of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") for the enforcement of that Order. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED and the cross-petition for enforcement is GRANTED. Leon M. Rosenblatt, Law Offices of Leon M. Rosenblatt, West
Boilermakers Local No. 374 v. N.L.R.B
852 F.2d 1353 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Cited 13 times
In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.
N.L.R.B. v. Mt. Pac. Ch. of Assoc. Gen. Con
270 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1959) Cited 21 times
No. 15966. August 28, 1959. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Louis Sherman, Cornelius Gray, William J. Brown, Washington, D.C., for Building Construction Trades Dept., AFL-CIO, intervenor. Elliott, Lee, Carney Thomas, Seattle, Wash., for Mountain Pacific Chapter of Associated Gen. Contractors of America. Lycette, Diamond Sylvester
N.L.R.B. v. Int. L. W. Union Local 13
581 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 3 times
No. 77-2313. July 21, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 19, 1978. William F. Wachter, Washington, D.C. (argued), for petitioner. Martha Goldin (argued), Hollywood, Cal., for respondent. Application For Enforcement of An Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge. Hon. Marion J. Callister, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge: The underlying
N.L.R.B. v. Int'l U. of Operating Engineers
555 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1977) Cited 3 times
In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.

International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving picture Technicians, Artists and Allied

10 Cited authorities

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

In Boilermakers, 852 F.2d at 1353, and later in Plumbers Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. NLRB, 50 F.3d 29, 34 (D.C. Cir. 1995), this court set forth the parameters of the heightened duty standard in hiring hall cases.

In N.L.R.B. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18, 555 F.2d 552, 553-54 (6th Cir. 1977), the court found that a union did not violate Section 158(b)(2) when it diminished the seniority rights of a member who attempted to sabotage an ongoing union election.