§

International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied

14-CB-101524 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 20, 2014)
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied

12 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,210 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers

    493 U.S. 67 (1989)   Cited 302 times
    Holding that failure of union to refer plaintiff for employment was not cognizable under the LMRDA because it did not involve "discipline"

  3. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  4. Labor Board v. Reliance Fuel Corp.

    371 U.S. 224 (1963)   Cited 133 times
    In Reliance Fuel Oil Corp., the Board found that Reliance Fuel Oil Corp. ("Reliance"), a New York corporation engaged in the business of selling fuel oil for heating purposes and servicing oil burners and boilers, was engaged in commerce within the meaning of the NLRA because it had "purchased a substantial amount of fuel oil from Gulf, a company concededly engaged in interstate commerce."

  5. Polish Alliance v. Labor Board

    322 U.S. 643 (1944)   Cited 138 times
    In Polish National Alliance v. NLRB, 322 U.S. 643, 64 S.Ct. 1196, 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944), the Court held that the National Labor Relations Act applied to a fraternal organization providing death, disability and accident benefits to its members and their beneficiaries.

  6. In re Sabo

    49 A.3d 1219 (D.C. 2012)   Cited 16 times
    Describing the process for an uncontested petition

  7. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  8. Lucas v. N.L.R.B

    333 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 13 times
    Defining substantial evidence

  9. Alton H. Piester, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    591 F.3d 332 (4th Cir. 2010)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 09-1148, 09-1255. Argued: October 28, 2009. Decided: January 15, 2010. ARGUED: Charles F. Thompson, Jr., Malone, Thompson Summers, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Alton H. Piester, LLC. Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. ON BRIEF: Michael D. Malone, Columbia, South Carolina, for Alton H. Piester, LLC. Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory Attorney, Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson

  10. Jacoby v. N.L.R.B

    233 F.3d 611 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Jacoby, the D.C. Circuit reiterated the reasoning it articulated in Plumbers Pipe Fitters in holding that the duty of fair representation also precludes departures from established exclusive hiring hall procedures and that the Board had articulated an erroneous view of the law in concluding that the duty of fair representation did not apply when such departures were caused by union negligence. 233 F.3d at 616-17.