8 Cited authorities
H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
397 U.S. 99 (1970) Cited 222 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."
Moore Burger Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
492 S.W.2d 934 (Tex. 1973) Cited 335 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that a subsequent purchaser of real property had constructive notice of all it would have learned if it had inquired of one who was in actual possession of the property and who claimed a superior interest
Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Etc. v. N.L.R.B
659 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1981) Cited 26 timesIn Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 659 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1981) (Pepsi Cola), the union initially rejected the offer and three weeks passed between offer and acceptance. During the three-week interval, the employer met with the union for several bargaining sessions but did not expressly withdraw its offer.
Presto Casting Co. v. N.L.R.B
708 F.2d 495 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 19 timesHolding that "general legal principles of contract formation . . . hold that counteroffers, rejections and a subsequent change of relative bargaining positions in favor of the offeror constitute withdrawal of the offer and that a purported acceptance thereafter is wholly ineffective"
N.L.R.B. v. Electra-Food Machinery, Inc.
621 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 15 timesHolding that employer overstepped its role when it refused to enter into written collective bargaining agreement because it believed union's entering the deal would violate union constitution
Georgia Kraft Co., Woodkraft Div. v. N.L.R.B
696 F.2d 931 (11th Cir. 1983) Cited 12 timesNo. 81-7852. January 24, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 8, 1983. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer, Murphy, J. Roy Weathersby, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner, cross-respondent. James Callear, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KRAVITCH, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges. HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this case we decide that substantial evidence supports enforcement
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W.A.D. Rentals Ltd.
919 F.2d 839 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 4 timesNo. 442, Docket 90-4062. Argued October 1, 1990. Decided November 27, 1990. Stuart M. Kirshenbaum, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent W.A.D. Rentals, Inc. Margaret G. Bezou, Washington, D.C. (Peter Winkler, Supervisory Atty., Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner N.L.R.B. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CARDAMONE and MINER, Circuit Judges
Hyatt Management Corp. of New York, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
817 F.2d 140 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 4 timesNoting that the rule also applies to the courts