10 Cited authorities
Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Ford v. Luria Steel Trading Corp.
192 F.2d 880 (8th Cir. 1951) Cited 42 timesIn Ford v. Luria Steel Trading Corp., 192 F.2d 880 (decided since our statute was enacted) it was held: "It has become settled law that a genuine issue as to a material fact cannot be tried and determined upon affidavits, and that it must conclusively be shown that there is no such issue in the case and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, before a summary judgment can lawfully be entered."
Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 27 timesIn Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.
Brawley v. United States
96 U.S. 168 (1877) Cited 89 timesFinding that contract was a requirements contract, where contract was for "eighty cords of wood, more or less, as shall be determined to be necessary by the post-commander for the regular supply . . . of the troops"
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.
211 F.2d 622 (8th Cir. 1954) Cited 20 timesIn Nash-Finch the union had specifically bargained over certain benefits under a hospital insurance plan, as well as Christmas bonuses, but in final negotiation these requests were dropped and did not appear in the collective bargaining agreement.
National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Walt Disney Prod
146 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1945) Cited 27 timesNo. 10603. December 5, 1944. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1945. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order against Walt Disney Productions. Order modified and enforced. Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, and David Finding and Charles Ryan, Attys., N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gunther R. Lessing, O'Melveney Myers
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Newark Morning L
120 F.2d 262 (3d Cir. 1941) Cited 24 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Newark Morning L. Co., 3 Cir., 120 F.2d 262, 268, 137 A.L.R. 849, this court, passing upon the right of an employee to reinstatement with back pay stated its conclusion that rights under the Act were public rights, though expressly reserving judgment upon the question whether the law of New Jersey might afford the claimant in the cited case a forum for the redress of her private grievances.
Hawkins v. United States
96 U.S. 689 (1877) Cited 59 timesHolding that the United States can be bound only by agents acting within the scope of the authority delegated to them
Booth v. Booth Bayliss Commercial School, Inc.
180 A. 278 (Conn. 1935) Cited 15 timesIn Booth v. Booth Bayliss Commercial School, Inc., 120 Conn. 221, 228-29 (1935), the Connecticut Supreme Court undertook an extended analysis of the due date for payment where the agreement is that a party is to "pay when able.
Roof v. Jerd
146 A. 250 (Vt. 1929) Cited 12 timesOpinion filed May 11, 1929. Evidence — Application of Parol Evidence Rule — Principal and Agent — Authority of Agent — Jury Question. 1. Parol evidence rule does not exclude parol proof of a prior or contemporaneous oral contract that is independent of, collateral to, and not inconsistent with written contract, though it relates to same general subject-matter and grows out of same transaction. 2. In action by payee against maker on certain promissory notes, given in part payment of purchase price