§

Intergraphic Corp. of America

160 N.L.R.B. 1284 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Intergraphic Corp. of America

10 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  3. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Downtown Bakery Corp.

    330 F.2d 921 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 28 times
    In Downtown Bakery, the court upheld the policy of the NLRB that the employer, faced with competing demands for recognition, violated sections 8(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Act by executing and maintaining a collective bargaining agreement with a rival union.

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 43 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, this Court granted an order of enforcement similar to one in the case now before us. The Board's Supplemental Decision and Order for the payment of back wages was enforced in that case by this Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated, reported at 228 F.2d 871.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten

    105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 62 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armato

    199 F.2d 800 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 38 times

    No. 10691. November 19, 1952. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx and Clark M. Robertson, Robertson Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. LINDLEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Lunder Shoe Corp.

    211 F.2d 284 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4774. March 15, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, and Bernard Dunau, Samuel M. Singer, and Wiley M. Craft, Washington, D.C., Attorneys on brief), for petitioner. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass. (Gordon Epstein, Boston, Mass., on brief), for respondents. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board

  9. Block v. A.M. Kidder Company

    276 F.2d 203 (5th Cir. 1960)

    No. 18129. March 29, 1960. Julius F. Parker, John A. Madigan, Jr., Caldwell, Parker, Foster, Madigan, Oven Moriarty, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellant. J. Velma Keen, A. Frank O'Kelley, Charles H. Spitz, Keen, O'Kelley Spitz, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. This suit was based on a cause of action admittedly existing, if at all, against A.M. Kidder Company, a limited partnership. The complaint

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Hoppes Mfg. Co.

    170 F.2d 962 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 5 times

    No. 10618. November 29, 1948. Appeal from National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order finding that Hoppes Manufacturing Company had restrained and coerced its employees in violation of section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157, and had refused to bargain collectively as required by section 8(5) of the same act, 29 U.S.C.A. section 158(5). Decree of enforcement entered. Wm. O. Murdock, of Washington, D.C. (David P.