§
Inta-Roto, Inc.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Teamsters Local v. Lucas Flour Co.

    369 U.S. 95 (1962)   Cited 1,181 times
    Holding that "under the mandate of Lincoln Mills " federal labor law is "paramount" when deciding issues raised under § 301

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  4. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  5. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  6. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 269 times
    Holding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"

  7. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  8. N.L.R.B. v. W. C. McQuaide, Inc.

    552 F.2d 519 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 40 times
    In McQuaide, supra, we stated flatly: "Rather than focus on either the subjective intent of the striker or the perception of the `victim,' we adopt an objective standard to determine whether conduct constitutes a threat sufficiently egregious to justify" the imposition of sanctions by the employer.

  9. Dallas Gen. Drivers, W. H., L. v. N.L.R.B

    355 F.2d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 40 times
    Reviewing factors considered in impasse cases

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Comfort, Inc.

    365 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times

    No. 18210. September 13, 1966. Rehearing Denied October 11, 1966. Richard S. Rodin, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington D.C., were with him on the brief. Bailey C. Webber, Ottumwa, Iowa, for respondent. Before VOGEL, Chief Judge, and MATTHES and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges. MATTHES