§

Insulating Fabricators, Inc.

144 N.L.R.B. 1325 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Insulating Fabricators, Inc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  4. Cone Brothers Contract. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    235 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 20 times

    No. 15830. June 22, 1956. Rehearing Denied July 20, 1956. Ralph C. Dell, Le Roy Allen, Tampa, Fla., Reeves, Allen Dell, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, CAMERON and JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. In the Employer's petition for review of the findings

  5. Old King Cole v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    260 F.2d 530 (6th Cir. 1958)   Cited 13 times
    Filing petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board's order, consistent with Section 10(g) of the NLRA

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Servette, Inc.

    313 F.2d 67 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 6 times

    No. 17660. December 28, 1962. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., and Warren M. Davison, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, Edwin H. Franzen, Stanley E. Tobin and Barry R. Weiss, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and CLARK, District Judge. CHASE A. CLARK, District

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Landis Tool Co.

    193 F.2d 279 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 16 times
    In Landis Tool Co. the company allowed an increase of 7 cents an hour to 15 pattern makers with whose union it was currently bargaining at the same time that the wage increase was allowed to some 900 other employees in the plant.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    258 F.2d 851 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16953. August 1, 1958. Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, and Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, and Maurice Alexander, Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.B. Fisher, J.D. McLaughlin, Gillespie Gillespie, Sherman, Tex., Fisher, McLaughlin Harrison, Paris, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and CAMERON, Circuit Judges. CAMERON, Circuit Judge. The question

  9. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"